Turner, M. G. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91, 2833–2849 (2010).
Google Scholar
Seidl, R. et al. Globally consistent climate sensitivity of natural disturbances across boreal and temperate forest ecosystems. Ecography 43, 967–978 (2020).
Google Scholar
Patacca, M. et al. Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 1359–1376 (2023).
Google Scholar
FAO. Forest Products 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3475m (FAO, 2022).
McDowell, N. G. et al. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science 368, eaaz9463 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pugh, T. A. M., Arneth, A., Kautz, M., Poulter, B. & Smith, B. Important role of forest disturbances in the global biomass turnover and carbon sinks. Nat. Geosci. 12, 730–735 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mayer, M., Baltensweiler, A., James, J., Rigling, A. & Hagedorn, F. A global synthesis and conceptualization of the magnitude and duration of soil carbon losses in response to forest disturbances. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 33, 141–150 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020).
Google Scholar
Palahí, M. et al. Concerns about reported harvests in European forests. Nature 592, E15–E17 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wernick, I. K. et al. Quantifying forest change in the European Union. Nature 592, E13–E14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nat. Sustain. 4, 63–70 (2021).
Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Storm and fire disturbances in Europe: distribution and trends. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 3605–3619 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sebald, J., Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Human or natural? Landscape context improves the attribution of forest disturbances mapped from Landsat in Central Europe. Remote Sens. Environ. 262, 112502 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sanginés de Cárcer, P. et al. The management response to wind disturbances in European forests. Curr. For. Reports 7, 167–180 (2021).
Kautz, M., Schopf, R. & Ohser, J. The “sun-effect”: microclimatic alterations predispose forest edges to bark beetle infestations. Eur. J. Res. 132, 453–465 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. J. Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry 86, 147–157 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bruni, C. et al. Wildfire exposure and risk in pulp paper companies’ plantations under extreme weather conditions: a case study in North-Western Portugal. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 100, 104064 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pretzsch, H., Biber, P., Schütze, G., Uhl, E. & Rötzer, T. Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nat. Commun. 5, 4967 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Hanewinkel, M., Kändler, G., Kublin, E. & Kohnle, U. An inventory-based approach for modeling single-tree storm damage—experiences with the winter storm of 1999 in southwestern Germany. Can. J. Res. 40, 1636–1652 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pausas, J. G. & Ribeiro, E. The global fire-productivity relationship. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 728–736 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pasztor, F., Matulla, C., Rammer, W. & Lexer, M. J. Drivers of the bark beetle disturbance regime in Alpine forests in Austria. Ecol. Manag. 318, 349–358 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., Sanchirico, J. N. & Smith, M. D. Causal inference in coupled human and natural systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5311–5318 (2019).
Google Scholar
Simard, M., Romme, W. H., Griffin, J. M. & Turner, M. G. Do mountain pine beetle outbreaks change the probability of active crown fire in lodgepole pine forests? Ecol. Monogr. 81, 3–24 (2011).
Google Scholar
Buma, B. Disturbance interactions: characterization, prediction, and the potential for cascading effects. Ecosphere 6, art70 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Coupled human and natural systems: the evolution and applications of an integrated framework. Ambio 50, 1778–1783 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hanewinkel, M., Hummel, S. & Albrecht, A. Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review. Eur. J. Res. 130, 329–351 (2011).
Google Scholar
Forest Europe. The State of Europe’s Forests 2020 (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 2020).
Nikinmaa, L. et al. Reviewing the use of resilience concepts in forest sciences. Curr. Rep. 6, 61–80 (2020).
Google Scholar
Triviño, M. et al. Enhancing resilience of boreal forests through management under global change: a review. Curr. Landsc. Ecol. Rep. 8, 103–118 (2023).
Google Scholar
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, 1099–1103 (2020).
Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. et al. Forest microclimates and climate change: Importance, drivers and future research agenda. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 2279–2297 (2021).
Google Scholar
Larsen, J. B. et al. Closer-to-nature Forest Management (European Forest Institute, 2022).
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Post‐disturbance canopy recovery and the resilience of Europe’s forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 25–36 (2022).
Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Persistent impacts of the 2018 drought on forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Biogeosciences 18, 5223–5230 (2021).
Google Scholar
Forzieri, G. et al. A spatially explicit database of wind disturbances in European forests over the period 2000–2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 257–276 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hlásny, T. et al. Bark beetle outbreaks in Europe: state of knowledge and ways forward for management. Curr. Rep. 7, 138–165 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hlásny, T. et al. Devastating outbreak of bark beetles in the Czech Republic: drivers, impacts, and management implications. Ecol. Manag. 490, 119075 (2021).
Google Scholar
Senf, C., Sebald, J. & Seidl, R. Increasing canopy mortality affects the future demographic structure of Europe’s forests. One Earth 4, 749–755 (2021).
Google Scholar
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Roberts, D. R. et al. Cross‐validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40, 913–929 (2017).
Google Scholar
JRC. Salvage loggings. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. http://data.europa.eu/89h/2100b612-a4b0-4897-829b-72b7b1e5782c (2021).
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A. & Zeileis, A. Implementing a class of permutation tests: the coin package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–23 (2008).
Google Scholar
R. Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2023).
Source link : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49116-0
Author :
Publish date : 2024-06-04 09:36:06
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.