* . * . . .
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Saturday, May 17, 2025
Love Europe
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
No Result
View All Result
Love Europe
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Europe’s cordon sanitaire against the far right may not work

October 6, 2024
in Opinion
Europe’s cordon sanitaire against the far right may not work
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of the far right. The strength of populist, nationalist and illiberal forces in the European elections and in France’s ongoing legislative polls has provoked anguish across the political spectrum. In France, especially, there is panic over Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National. 

But fear and loathing, however understandable against parties with a legacy of hateful rhetoric, are not adequate political responses.

Most of Europe’s political mainstream has doubled down on the cordon sanitaire, the ostracism of elected representatives to the right of traditional conservative parties. In campaigns this involves painting such parties as not just political adversaries but threats to democracy itself. When the results are in, the cordon sanitaire rules out parliamentary collaboration, let alone a governing coalition, with them.

It is time to admit that this approach can sometimes do more harm than good. Most obviously, it has not prevented Europe’s nationalist right from building up its voter support over recent decades. 

Portraying a party as so outside a community’s political norms that it can never be allowed near power can backfire. It reinforces its voters’ sense that traditional elites treat them with contempt and neglect — part of what attracts people to protest movements in the first place. Devising ways to marginalise them can also undermine respect for democratic norms. If a party is always — regardless of its success, conduct and programme — prevented from influencing policy, how are its voters supposed to think democracy will give their grievances due consideration? What stake does such a party itself have in the norms?

Demonising parties working to detoxify themselves — and there are many — is risky. The RN has for some time cracked down on its most extreme racist elements and been on its best behaviour in the outgoing French legislature. That gives Le Pen a measure of credibility when she presents it as the most responsible actor on the political scene. For many apolitical voters, panicked warnings by other politicians will come across as hysterical and only make them more disposed towards the RN.

A few countries have dropped the cordon sanitaire. The Norwegian and Finnish experiences of admitting rightwing populists into centre-right coalitions is instructive. The realisation that a share of power was possible, and the public spotlight on them once they possessed it, induced them to polish some of their roughest edges and strike compromises to get some of their preferences enacted. The curious result in Norway was a boom in road building combined with high and rising carbon taxes.

In Sweden, a pact of parliamentary support broke the cordon sanitaire against the Sweden Democrats. It was and remains a nastier party than its Nordic counterparts, but the prospect of actual influence did motivate a shift away from racist aggression towards democratic responsibility. (Sweden and Finland bucked the trend of far-right advances in the EU elections.) Italian leader Giorgia Meloni’s party, too, has proved rather more pragmatic in office than expected. 

This does not always work. Austria’s Freedom party does not look mellowed by a spell in government marred by scandals of corruption and Russian influence on the intelligence services. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and Poland’s Jaroslaw Kaczyński used power to undermine democratic institutions. Let’s not even talk about Donald Trump.

But the truth is that Europe’s far-right parties are highly heterogeneous. That is why they punch below their weight in the European parliament. Their lack of coherence has allowed the centre to ignore them, but also mistakenly to ignore the political diversity that creates this weakness. There is a difference between pursuing ugly policies and aiming to subvert democracy.

In the Nordics, it was good for democracy to reward rightwing fringe parties on a journey towards respectability. But this must not be done with clearly anti-democratic parties such as Alternative for Germany. There the case for the cordon sanitaire remains sound.

What about the RN? Le Pen’s attempted dédiabolisation and the party’s frantic rowing back on its promises suggest an interest in being successful within the system rather than in tearing it down. Most of France’s elite does not believe this, and may be right. Perhaps the RN itself does not know. 

Europeans must ask themselves how deeply they believe in their institutions’ civilising powers. Given where the polls have been moving, to trust the moderating effects of democracy may be our best hope.

[email protected]

Video: Why the far right is surging in Europe | FT Film

Letter in response to this column:

Far-right assault on the EU must be done from the outside / From Salvatore Bragantini, Milan, Italy

Source link : https://www.ft.com/content/30cb3fc8-b4d5-4e31-a2a4-9d47bab7b5ee

Author :

Publish date : 2024-06-29 07:00:00

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Tags: Europeopinion
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Time off and a healthy lifestyle are driving some young Americans to Europe: ‘You are a person first and a worker 2nd’ – Business Insider

Next Post

Europe’s A.I. ‘Champion’ Sets Sights on Tech Giants in U.S. – The New York Times

Related Posts

Towards a brand new period in East-West connectivity – China Every day
Opinion

Towards a brand new period in East-West connectivity – China Every day

Gable: Dialogue key for future alliance with Europe – TelegraphHerald.com
Opinion

Gable: Dialogue key for future alliance with Europe – TelegraphHerald.com

Struggle calls for innovation. That’s why Europe should help its startups [OPINION] – Defence Business Europe
Opinion

Struggle calls for innovation. That’s why Europe should help its startups [OPINION] – Defence Business Europe

ADVERTISEMENT

Highlights

Lithuanian Chief Calls for Ambitious 5% NATO Spending Goal – EUROP INFO

Zelensky Signals New Hope for Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks – EUROP INFO

Alarming New Developments – EUROP INFO

Pioneering the Path to EU Membership! – EUROP INFO

Our Unforgettable Winter Family Adventure in Norway! – EUROP INFO

Categories

Archives

October 2024
MTWTFSS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
« Sep   Nov »
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Opinion

© 2024 Love-Europe

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version