Ukraine hopes Washington will support Kyiv’s NATO bid after elections, as opposition in Europe persists

Ukraine hopes Washington will support Kyiv's NATO bid after elections, as opposition in Europe persists

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (R) shakes hands with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban as he arrives for the 2024 Berlin Process Summit on Oct. 14, 2024 in Berlin, Germany. (Tobias Schwarz / AFP via Getty Images)

But experience shows that despite fiery rhetoric, Bratislava has rarely broken Western consensus on key policy issues. Budapest did, along with Turkey, block the accession of Finland and Sweden but eventually withdrew its opposition after gaining some benefits.

“I can imagine that Hungary will make some requests regarding the Hungarian minority in (Ukraine’s) Zakarpattia Oblast,” Pavel Havlicek, a research fellow at the Prague-based Association for International Affairs, told the Kyiv Independent.

In a similar fashion, Budapest has used the 75,000-large Hungarian minority in Ukraine’s westernmost region to hamper Kyiv’s EU accession.

“Of course, we know how it went with Sweden and Finland… in the end, it was only a matter of time before the pressure from the alliance was too strong,” Havlicek added, noting that Bratislava is even less likely to put up real resistance due to its security dependence on the U.S.

Nevertheless, Budapest has more reasons to obstruct Ukraine’s invitation and entry than it did with the two Nordic countries.

“As criticism of Ukraine and the pro-peace narrative have become such core parts of Fidesz’s (Hungary’s ruling party) politics, it is much harder to imagine that the current Hungarian National Assembly would ratify Ukraine’s accession to NATO,” says Patrik Szicherle, a research fellow at the Globsec think tank.

“This does not mean Hungary would never agree, but I think it would take a longer time to convince the public that it would benefit Hungary.”

According to Politico’s sources, other countries, like Belgium, Slovenia, or Spain, are also averse to a quick invite for Ukraine but are less vocal about it, hiding in Berlin and Washington’s shadow.

“Unfortunately, I think that the political support within NATO is not strong enough at this time,” said James Goldgeier, a professor at the American University in Washington D.C. and an expert on NATO enlargement.

Voicing skepticism about Biden actually changing his position, Goldgeier added: “The biggest question is what approach would a Harris administration take if she were to win the election. I don’t think we know that yet.”

Harris did not publicly commit to pushing Ukraine’s NATO bid forward. Nor did her Republican challenger, Donald Trump, whose potential return to the White House prompts fears of the U.S. decreasing or canceling its support of Ukraine.

Read also: This is how North Korean troops could be used in Russia’s war in Ukraine

NATO membership and compromises

Even if Kyiv manages to muster support among all 32 members, Zelensky acknowledged that the actual membership will have to wait until the end of the war.

The military outcome of the full-scale war is unclear, but the current situation seems to favor Russia and makes it unlikely that Ukraine will be able to liberate all of its territories in the near future.

While Ukraine’s allies have publicly avowed commitment to its territorial integrity, the present situation led to some speculations about more “realistic” pathways toward NATO membership.

Speaking to the Financial Times, former NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg proposed a “West German solution,” suggesting that the alliance’s Article 5 could extend only to territories held by Kyiv.

The areas occupied by Russia would be de facto left outside of the alliance without officially acknowledging them as Russian. Some media reports also suggested that some in the West are considering the possibility of Ukraine temporarily trading its territory for NATO membership.

The areas occupied by Russia would be de facto left outside of the alliance without officially acknowledging them as Russian.

Talking to the Kyiv Independent, Grand said that while he fully supports Ukraine restoring its territorial integrity, “full control over the entire territory should, however, not be a prerequisite for joining NATO.”

A soldier looks at a fire caused by artillery fire in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine on July 29, 2024. (Kostiantyn Liberov/Libkos/Getty Images)

The expert said that the West Germany solution “proved a good decision for the Alliance, for Germany and for European security” and “some lessons of this experience could apply to Ukraine.”

Others, like historian Timothy Garton Ash, pointed out differences in the German and Ukrainian starting points. Unlike Russian-occupied Ukraine, East Germany was not being “brutally Russified,” he wrote in an op-ed in the Financial Times.

Oleksiy Melnyk, the co-director of Kyiv-based think tank Razumkov Center, said such a decision would not be the most “favorable scenario,” but it is not unfeasible if the allies provide enough military power to back it up.

He also mollified fears that accepting Ukraine into NATO would automatically mandate the allies to put boots on the ground. Extending the invitation and accepting Ukraine would be powerful by itself as it would impose strategic uncertainty on the Kremlin: “We don’t have to (send our soldiers). But we have the right at any moment to do so.”

Indeed, Article 5 requires the allies merely to take “such action as (they) deem necessary” to safeguard collective security but does not dictate a full-blown military response.

At least publicly, Kyiv has been adamant that it will not compromise on territory or sovereignty. Commenting on the possibility of entering NATO without occupied territories, Zelensky said that “no matter what path we take, legally, no one will recognize the occupied territories as territories of other states.”

The Ukrainian president noted that he was not approached directly with the NATO-for-territory proposals but believes some partners are sending these signals through the media.

“I think that in this case, everything depends on Ukrainian society,” Zelensky said.

A survey conducted in May 2024 showed that 55% of Ukrainians opposed territorial concession. While still constituting a majority, it was a drop from 65% and 74% in February 2024 and December 2023.

In the same poll, roughly half of the respondents were open to the possibility of Russia de facto holding on to some occupied territories if Ukraine can join NATO and gain real security guarantees.

Ukrainian political analyst Mykola Davydiuk said that if NATO is actually considering the West German scenario, it needs to make the offer officially, but it must also understand how Russia would react to such a step.

Shop now

We’ve been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Source link : http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=671d5227b3224281be701ad89c3988ed&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo.com%2Fnews%2Fukraine-hopes-washington-support-kyivs-185205084.html&c=9155011853660471040&mkt=de-de

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 13:20:00

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Exit mobile version