Husband sues travel insurance company after it refuses to pay because it determined his wife could have been treated in Germany
Published Nov 10, 2024 • Last updated 1 hour ago • 3 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
An American who spends summers in B.C. is suing a travel insurance provider for $175,000 after it denied his claim to fly his wife, who had COVID and pneumonia, home from Germany in 2022 for emergency medical treatment. The woman needed an air ambulance, similar to what is pictured here. GREG AGNEW/TIMES & TRANSCRIPTArticle content
An American who spends summers in B.C. is suing a travel insurance provider for $175,000 after it denied his claim to fly his wife, who had COVID and pneumonia, home from Germany in 2022 for emergency medical treatment.
Stephen McNally has filed a notice of civil claim against the B.C.-based MSH International (Canada) Ltd. on behalf of his wife, Fiona McNally, who died in 2023.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
She had Canadian and American citizenship and qualified for the policy that provided for emergency medical treatment, if needed, for a three-week trip they took to Europe in the summer of 2022, said the lawsuit.
Fiona, then 65, had ALS but didn’t require assistance with the activities of daily living, a policy requirement.
McNally said the couple, who live in Florida in winter and Nanoose Bay on Vancouver Island in summer , specifically requested coverage for major issues and to be returned to Florida for treatment as soon as possible.
He said the policy covered emergency air transportation by air ambulance to a hospital in Fiona’s country of origin for immediate emergency medical treatment.
The lawsuit was filed in B.C. because the policy is governed by the laws of the province where the policy was issued.
“MSH has wrongfully denied coverage of this claim,” McNally said.
The couple flew to London from Washington state on July 12, 2022, and 10 days later, Fiona was admitted to an ICU in Frankfurt, the lawsuit said. She had been diagnosed with COVID, pulmonary pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia.
Travel Time
Thanks for signing up!
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
On Aug. 1, McNally called MSH to open a claim and three days later began plans to have Fiona flown by air ambulance to the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla.
Her doctors confirmed she was unable to fly on a regular passenger plane and needed the ICU capability provided by the air ambulance.
From Aug. 1 to Aug. 15, McNally “worked diligently to provide documentation” to MSH so she could fly home, and an MSH official advised him on Aug. 15 that MSH doesn’t withhold treatment and “Stephen should proceed as needed” and file the claim later, the lawsuit said
And he was also told by a second MSH employee that day that going ahead with plans to fly his wife home during its investigation of the claim would not affect his coverage, based on a review of medical documents MSH had already received.
On Aug. 15, “the very same day MSH encouraged Stephen to proceed with the air ambulance, MSH ‘informally’ denied the claim and recommended McNally file a formal claim” and he did, the lawsuit states.
On Aug. 22, McNally flew his wife home on an air ambulance.
On Dec. 30 MSH denied coverage, ruling the care Fiona needed could have been provided in Germany and the air ambulance was “not required for immediate emergency treatment,” nor was it approved or arranged in advance, as required by the policy.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The wording of the policy includes that emergency air transportation when approved and arranged in advance covers such service to the “nearest appropriate facility or to a Canadian hospital or to a hospital” in the policyholder’s country.
That section “does not require that treatment be unavailable where the injury occurred,” in this case, Germany, McNally said in the lawsuit.
He also said MSH told him, that “proceeding with the emergency air transportation without MSH’s final approval would not affect” coverage.
McNally is seeking the $175,000 and $100,000 in for bad faith and punitive damages.
The legal grounds cited in the lawsuit is misrepresentation of the contract and the duty of good faith and honest performance, the lawsuit said.
Neither MSH nor McNally returned a request for comment.
None of the allegations has been proved in court.
Recommended from Editorial
B.C. court rules children can fight father’s will that left them nothing
B.C. court rules police can apply to dispose of evidence from Robert Pickton’s farm
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the news you need to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. With a subscription, you’ll get unlimited access to The Vancouver Sun online, as well as the ePaper and our app. Support us by subscribing today: The Vancouver Sun.
Article content
Share this article in your social network
Source link : http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=6730f831b9a34d40ae8c821b3f04a9fd&url=https%3A%2F%2Fvancouversun.com%2Fnews%2Ftravel-insurer-denies-b-c-residents-175k-ambulance-bill-from-2022-europe-trip&c=221153649118847465&mkt=de-de
Author :
Publish date : 2024-11-10 08:54:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.
